A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated countrywide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the internet site became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting as an alternative that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one performs have been carried out determined by Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, usually do not change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged once the authorized expenses have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen Rene Collier and Paul Feely beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter whether it will in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.